Posts Tagged ‘2006’

Melvins: A Senile Animal

Thursday, July 3rd, 2008

Between their greatest hits, live, collaborative, and 25-year-old-demo releases, it’s sometimes hard to remember that Melvins do hit the studio every few years to release new music as a band. They do, though. They’ve got a new album due out next week, and this one, from 2006, is their first since 2002’s excellent Hostile Ambient Takeover.

For a long time I didn’t consider Melvins one of my favorite bands, my opinion probably overly-colored by my young experience with “Cow” from 1991’s Bullhead, which starts with one slow drum beat for what feels like several minutes. Over the years I’ve grown to appreciate their “one long note” and noisy output, but it’s still not the type of thing you think of as being enjoyable leisurely listening. F**k that, though. There’s way too much awesome, accessible music in their catalog to ignore it any longer. Melvins is my favorite band.

Oh, that feels so good to say. For about 13 years I’ve been describing Mr. Bungle as my favorite band, and they haven’t put out an album for nine years. “You know Faith No More?” my explanation would begin. No longer. I’ll still have to explain to everybody who Melvins is (which is a tragedy in at least two ways), but now I can at least point to a band who is continuing to add to their legacy, and awesomely so. Unless I found out lead singer King Buzzo is some kind of horrible criminal before the birth of my first son, that son will be named after him to honor his contribution to music and the human condition.

You can put A Senile Animal right up near the top of the list as one of Melvins’ best in their extensive discography. It’s a good intro to the band, too, as it’s mostly straight-forward aggressive, thrashy stuff. They’ve put aside the molasses-paced sludge for at least one album in favor of a tight, clean, but still absolutely huge sound. They even implement hand claps on “A History Of Drunks.” Melvins are special because of all of what they are, but when they release an album this accessible and fantastic, to go along with other classics like Houdini, Stoner Witch, and Hostile Ambient Takeover, you can’t help but wondering if I’d have to introduce them to fewer people if they had decided just to be a metal band.

Things get a bit repetitively mundane near the end, starting at about “The Mechanical Bride.” Up until that point, though, this was on a five-lunchbox trajectory. “The Hawk” is the Best Song Ever, and I encourage you to check it out if you’ve ever been curious about Melvins or wonder what all the fuss was about.

Rating:

Mixers:
“The Talking Horse,” “Rat-Faced Granny,” “The Hawk,” “You’ve Never Been Right”
Keepers:
everything else
Filed Between: Houdini Live—A Live History of Gluttony and Lust
and Melvins + Lustmord (Pigs Of The Roman Empire)

Bruce Springsteen: We Shall Overcome–The Seeger Sessions

Wednesday, March 12th, 2008

 

weshallovercome.jpg

Bruce Springsteen is only 58 years old. And yet, after his fantastically energetic tour with the E Street Band in 2001, with his face growing increasingly wrinkled and funny-lookin’, he has decided, I believe prematurely, that he needed to wrangle himself a new image as a crazy old coot. He is most certainly not The Boss anymore. Instead, he’s more like the old guy at the bar who, when you stop in at three in the afternoon to ask for directions, starts telling you some rambling story that seems to start in the middle and is peppered with a hankering for the good ol’ days, and, despite your non-committal grunts while you wait for the bartender’s attention, just keeps right on going trying to engage you with personal questions.

Don’t think it’s dementia settling in…this is all calculated. We know from first-hand accounts that Springsteen’s blue-collar, working-class image and his raw, rough sound are both meticulously crafted specifically to feel spontaneous and natural. I’m not a fan of this new turn, though, because it’s just not as believable as the old image was. Springsteen’s no actor, and I think his old image aligned more naturally with his values and experiences so that he could pull it off, while this mumbly old man thing is a bit of a reach for him.

But the new character needs a stage on which to spout about things he doesn’t really know to the level he wants you to think he does, and so we get We Shall Overcome: The Pete Seeger Sessions, a collection of traditional songs re-done by Springsteen and a large group of musicians in three one-day sessions between 1997 and 2006 (reportedly without rehearsal, though I find that hard to believe, or at least a very strict definition of “rehearsal”). I’m reminded of the taxi driver who, in 1999, positively insisted to me that a few years prior there was a Super Bowl in Chicago that was severely blurred by a blizzard when, on this disc’s accompanying DVD, I hear Springsteen talking about how acoustic instruments were meant to be more integrated into daily life than their electric brethren or how there’s some unquantifiable kind of energy in music or performances like those on this disc that, supposedly, isn’t in music that isn’t. It’s not that I necessarily disagree with him on any of these points (unlike the cabbie, who was on another planet), it just comes across as insincere and fake from this baby boomer baron of the electric guitar. What’s more, I’m frustrated that he and Patty are the hamming-it-up stars of the DVD and the brilliant musicians that shared the house-cum-recording-studio with Springsteen are ignored at best and dismissed at worst.

The songs on here are absolutely fantastic. There really is a bit of magic captured with several different feels weaving in and out of the program. The album begins with an upbeat, jug band, hoe-down feel of “Old Dan Tucker,” moves to the superbly anti-war lyrics on top of an Irish jig-ish tune of “Mrs. McGrath,” and then hits the gospel-y “O Mary Don’t You Weep,” all in the first four tracks. “Jacob’s Ladder” has a thrilling communal, gospel feel and “Pay Me My Money Down” will not fail to get you singing along while placing you, sloshed, in a bar a few hours after a hard day on the docks. Every single song has some kind of redeeming quality: even those that didn’t get kept at least made me think about it. For example, “Shenandoah” is hella annoying, but the lush instrumentation of horns, strings, and choir are brilliantly elevating.

So what makes the bad songs bad? Unfortunately, it’s the same thing that bugged me about the DVD: Springsteen himself, with his vocal style and his occlusion of the rest of the band. Springsteeen’s clearly settled on this back/top of the mouth, nasal cavity rattling, yarly singing thing, and I can’t stand it. Again, there’s an insincerity to it that makes it even worse. It’s so over the top that even the folks Springsteen is trying to emulate don’t sound like this. I’ve hated this style since it first showed up on The Rising, and if it continues much longer, I may just be done with Springsteen, a claim I can’t believe I would have made even seven years ago. I also never would have believed even a few years ago that I would feel so done with Springsteen the man. But the talent and performance of his band members, along with the crystal-clear yet wonderfully dense sound produced by Recorder Toby Scott and Mixer Bob Clearmountain, are clearly the strength of the record, yet with his stubborn insistence on mumbling in a faux-twang and on portraying himself as the leader and arranger who imbues the musicians with talent get in the way. It’s not even clear what Seeger has to do with this album, as almost all of these songs are traditional. If Seeger popularized many of them in his day, he’s not given credit for it, and so Springsteen just comes across as petty in this rude dismissal of a legend.

I wrote in my review of Devils & Dust that I was blaming Brendan O’Brien for that album and for The Rising. Springsteen himself is listed as this album’s producer, and O’Brien’s name is nowhere to be found, so the O’Brien as Brutus theory may need to be revisisted.. This is a good album, but I’m so hard on Springsteen here because after more than 25 years of continually raising the bar of what rock and roll could be while only occasionally and briefly lapsing into the suck that strikes all musicians able to go that long (primarily Human Touch), I hold him to a higher standard. 1995’s The Ghost Of Tom Joad was Springsteen’s last good studio album, so by this disc’s release in 2006 we were due. I had held out a lot of hope for this one, but the results are mixed.

Rating:

Mixers: “Mrs. McGrath,” “Jacob’s Ladder,” “Pay Me My Money Down”
Keepers: “Jesse James,” “O Mary Don’t You Weep,” “John Henry,” “Erie Canal
Filed Between: Devils and Dust and Stanley, Son of Theodore: Yet Another Alternative Music Sampler

Cat Power: The Greatest

Wednesday, January 23rd, 2008

thegreatest1.jpg

I had this whole review mentally written at a stoplight a couple of nights ago, but of course I’ve forgotten it all now. Sigh.

At first blush, there’s nothing about Cat Power that should appeal to me. She’s got Norah Jones-syndrome, where most of her songs sound like each other, even moreso on this album than You Are Free, its predecessor. She’s also got Modest Mouse-syndrome where, when she’s singing, she doesn’t seem to know whether she wants to sing a word or not and so just kind of mumbles it, letting it fall off into the air. (Modest Mouse does the same thing on guitar and it drives me bats**t insane.) Normally I’m not a fan of such a languid, timid presentation, especially when it’s 40 straight minutes of languid timidity. I am a fan of The Greatest, though.

When Cat Power (aka Chan Marshall) does sing out, her breathiness and timbre is strongly resonant of Beth Orton, and you know how big a fan I am of Orton’s. In fact, Marshall is even huskier than Orton when she wants to be, like she is here on “Lived In Bars.”

I’m also a fan of the instrumentation. The Greatest is an extremely mellow CD and the instrumentation is often sparse, giving the songs nowhere to hide. And for the most part, there’s no reason for them to be hiding, so the fact that the strings, piano, and horns used throughout the album are so exposed helps the songs. That naked exposure also emphasizes the frail, pained nature of most of the lyrics.

Among the high points is the gorgeous, dreamlike ballad “Where Is My Love,” where Marshall’s voice shines through like a guiding beacon through misty, romantic imagery reminiscent of waking up in a cloudy haze next to your lover. I’m also a huge fan of the first minute of so of “Willie,” where the simple, one-note horn riff combines with rich piano chords to promise a song that fails to quite deliver on that promise.

It’s a testament to the quality of the songwriting and performances here that I like this somber, muttering CD as much as I do. It’s even more surprising when you consider that the sound quality of the guitar on “Empty Shell,” “The Moon,” and “Hate” are terrible. It’s cool, though, because she’s using the muffled, lo-fi sound as an effect, rather than it being some unintentional failing of the album’s engineer. “The Moon” is even a mix CD candidate and it’s got a very audible buzz throughout it. “Hate” is probably the worst song here, but it’s not because of the lo-fi quality…it’s because I can’t stand to listen to such a simple i-vi-V progression for three-and-a-half minutes.

So it’s not perfect, and she pushes it too far sometimes, but for the most part Cat Power has succeeded grandly with a recipe I rarely care for.

 

Rating:

Mixers: “The Greatest,” “Lived In Bars,” “Where Is My Love,” “The Moon”
Non-keepers: “After It All,” “Hate”
Filed Between: You Are Free and Nick Cave and The Bad Seeds (Let Love In)